Book – The Death of Cancer by Vincent T. DeVita Dr. MD 癌症之死

If you are a cancer patient, you may want to read the book titled “The Death of Cancer“, which may help you understand that there is no cure doctors can provide to eliminate your cancer. You should not expect that your doctors and their treatments can help defeat your cancer.

The book authored by Vincent T. Devita Dr. M.D. does not give you any guidelines on cancer treatments. But it does remind you of a few things you need know regarding cancer treatments. From the book, you can learn:

1) There is no cancer cure. Doctors never say their treatments including surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy could cure your cancer. The common terms about your survival is regression, remission, complete remission, 5-year survival and 10-year survival. Industrial cancer treatment developers have no intention to develop any cancer cure. Dr. DeVita was actually fired from the memorial Sloan Kettering cancer institute because his boss feared that he intended to develop cancer cures.

2) Doctors are not cancer treatment developers. What doctors do is, they follow the treatment guidelines to provide their services. If you are lucky, your doctor can strictly follow the guidelines. If you are unlucky, they strictly follow their guidelines. So following their guidelines can be a double-edged sword. Either way the treatments can lead to the same outcome – patients are likely to die from either the treatments or of cancer.

3) No treatments can kill all cancer cells. When surgeons say the surgery is successful, they mean that they have done their best to remove your tumor. Surgery is unlikely to take out all cancerous cells. Radiation can kill cancer cells effectively. But in addition to the side effects, the worst side effect is that the radiation cause cell mutations and the survived cancer cells likely come back to kill the patients. Chemotherapy drugs act like radiation. They cannot kill all cancer cells. They can cause cancer cells more aggressive and dangerous.

4) Treatments compete for cancer patients. Surgeons, radiotherapists and chemotherapists all want a piece of pie in the cancer treatment. The way how a cancer patient get treated may not reflect the best interest of the cancer patient.

The biggest problem with all the conventional treatments is recurrence, which along with treatments eventually kills the patients. Recurrence may occur once or twice or multiple times. Because you can not kill all cancer cells, the injured cancer cells can mutate to develop drug resistance. When they come back, no drug can kill them.

Vincent T. DeVita Dr. M.D. is former director for the National Cancer Institute.

The problems with the conventional treatments are

1) They cannot kill all cancer cells
2) They can injure cancer cells making cancer cells more aggressive and resistant to all drugs
3) They can create new cancer cells because radiation therapy and chemotherapy are often cancer causing agents.

Evidence is enough to suggest that killing cancer cells is not the best solution to overcome cancer.

The biggest problem with the cancer industry is that the industry as a whole has no intention to develop the cure for any specific cancer. This does not mean that all doctors are evil. Many doctors are actually kind enough that they want their patients cured. But often times, these doctors are not in a commanding position and they cannot do much for the development of cancer cures. When some drugs show promise, they will get suppressed, and could never find a way to the market.

如果您是癌症患者,則可能需要閱讀一本名為“癌症之死”的書,這可能有助於您了解醫生無法提供消除癌症的治療方法。您不應期望您的醫生及其治療方法可以幫助您戰勝癌症。

由Vincent T. Devita博士撰寫的這本書並未為您提供任何有關癌症治療的指南。但是,它的確使您想起了一些有關癌症治療的知識。從這本書中,您可以學習:

1)沒有治愈癌症的方法。醫生從未說過他們的手術,放射療法和化學療法等療法可以治愈您的癌症。關於生存的常見術語是回歸,緩解,完全緩解,5年生存和10年生存。工業癌症治療開發人員無意開發任何癌症治愈方法。 DeVita博士實際上是從紀念斯隆·凱特琳癌症研究所解僱的,因為他的老闆擔心他打算開發治療癌症的方法。

2)醫生不是癌症治療的開發商。醫生所做的是,他們遵循治療指南提供服務。如果幸運的話,您的醫生可以嚴格按照指南進行操作。如果您不走運,他們將嚴格遵守其準則。因此,遵循他們的指南可能是一把雙刃劍。無論哪種方式,治療都可以導致相同的結果-患者可能死於治療或癌症。

3)沒有治療方法可以殺死所有癌細胞。當外科醫生說手術成功時,就意味著他們已盡力清除了腫瘤。手術不可能切除所有癌細胞。輻射可以有效殺死癌細胞。但是除了副作用之外,最嚴重的副作用是放射線會引起細胞突變,而存活的癌細胞很可能會再次殺死患者。化學療法的藥物就像放射一樣。他們無法殺死所有癌細胞。它們可以使癌細胞更具攻擊性和危險性。

4) 治療爭奪癌症患者。 外科醫生,放射治療師和化學治療師都希望在癌症治療中佔一席之地。 癌症患者的治療方式可能無法反映出癌症患者的最大利益。

所有常規治療的最大問題是複發,其與治療一起最終殺死患者。復發可能發生一次或兩次或多次。因為您無法殺死所有癌細胞,所以受傷的癌細胞可能發生突變以產生耐藥性。當他們回來時,沒有藥物可以殺死他們。

Vincent T. DeVita博士是美國國家癌症研究所的前任主任。

常規治療的問題是

1)他們無法殺死所有癌細胞
2)它們可以傷害癌細胞,從而使癌細胞更具攻擊性並對所有藥物產生抗藥性
3)它們可以產生新的癌細胞,因為放射療法和化學療法通常是致癌劑。

有足夠的證據表明殺死癌細胞不是克服癌症的最佳方法。

癌症行業的最大問題是整個行業無意開發任何特定癌症的治療方法。這並不意味著所有醫生都是邪惡的。實際上,許多醫生都很善良,希望他們的病人治愈。但是通常,這些醫生並不處於主導地位,他們不能為癌症治療的發展做太多事情。當某些藥物顯示出希望時,它們將被鎮壓,永遠找不到進入市場的途徑。

Vincent T. Devita Jr. MD nd Elizabeth Devita-Raeburn (2015) The Death of Cancer, published by fsgbooks.com ISBN 978-0-374-13560-7 (Hardback cover)

From this book, you can learn the following:

How do oncologists including surgeons, radiotherapists, and chemo-therapists treat their patients?

1) Radiation and chemotherapy dosages are important for the odds of survival for a cancer patient. Dr. Devita found that higher doses are needed to “cure” a cancer. It is often that cancer centers do not use the optimal doses for a couple of reasons. First, they do not know the best optimal doses are. Every doctor may have his own definition of optimal dose. Second, even if they know what the optimal dose is, they would not use the optimal dose because optimal doses tend to be high dosages which would bring about too much side effects that patients would suffer. So doctors tend to use low doses which would more likely induce mutations that eventually lead to the development of second cancer. Secondary cancer or recurrent cancers tend to be more aggressive and resistant to drugs that were used to treat primary cancer. As a result, there is no longer any drug available to the patient to effectively treat him and the patient dies from the secondary cancer. Oncologists often use a universal dose for all cancer patients regardless of patients’ body weight or skin surface area.

2) Oncologists compete for cancer patients. Whoever first gets a cancer patient will treat the patient first. They do not consider the best outcome of the patient.

3) Not all cancer centers are equally equipped to treat all types of cancer. Not all oncologists are equally competent in providing the treatment of a particular type of cancer. Oncologists can make mistakes, and put their patients in grave danger because they can misdiagnose the disease or do not use treatments properly. Most cancer doctors may not be as competent.

4) The majority of oncologists may not care for their cancer patients. Only a very small number of oncologists would do whatever it takes to try to save them.

5) Surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy all can promote metastasis or spreading of cancer to distant organs or tissues. No surgery can remove all cancer cells. No radiation or chemotherapy medications may eliminate all cancerous cells.

6) Conventional treatments are not intended to cure any cancer. Oncologists do not use the word “cure” because they do not believe there is any cure for any cancer. The common terms is chemical remission, complete remission, long term survival. No doctors could guarantee that the treatment they use on a patient would result in any desired prognosis.

7) Cancer centers are not interested in developing any cure for any cancer. Oncologists may use substandard treatments that do not render any efficacy against a cancer. Universities have conducted tremendous amounts of basic research. But neither clinicians nor university professors have the motive to convert the basic findings into any treatments that can help cancer patients.

8) No treatment can kill 100% cancer cells. All treatments may lead to secondary cancer.

9) A treatment may get a cancer patient into remission, but the treatment itself such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy medication may generate secondary cancer, which will sooner or later come to kill the patient.

10) Treatments can be driven by monetary interest. Surgeons may do radical mastectomy even though lumpectomy provides the same outcome because radical mastectomy earns more money for doctors.

11) Oncologists may be more interested in defending themselves against law suits or maximizing their earnings than healing patients.

从本书中,您可以学到以下内容:

包括外科医生,放射治疗师和化学治疗师在内的肿瘤学家如何治疗患者?

1)放射线和化疗剂量对于癌症患者的生存几率很重要。德维塔博士发现,需要更大剂量来“治愈”癌症。癌症中心通常出于几个原因而没有使用最佳剂量。首先,他们不知道最佳的最佳剂量。每个医生可能都有自己的最佳剂量定义。其次,即使他们知道最佳剂量是什么,他们也不会使用最佳剂量,因为最佳剂量往往是高剂量,这将带来患者将遭受的太多副作用。因此,医生倾向于使用低剂量,这很可能导致突变,最终导致第二种癌症的发展。继发性癌症或复发性癌症往往更具侵略性,并且对用于治疗原发性癌症的药物具有抵抗力。结果,患者不再有任何药物可以有效治疗他,并且患者死于继发性癌症。肿瘤学家通常对所有癌症患者使用通用剂量,而不管患者的体重或皮肤表面积如何。

2)肿瘤学家争夺癌症患者。谁首先得了癌症患者,谁就会首先治疗该患者。他们没有考虑患者的最佳结局。

3)并非所有癌症中心都具备治疗所有类型癌症的平等装备。并非所有的肿瘤科医生都具有同样能力胜任特定类型癌症的治疗。肿瘤科医生可能会犯错,并使患者处于严重危险之中,因为他们可能会误诊疾病或未正确使用治疗方法。大多数癌症医生可能没有能力。

4)大多数肿瘤科医生可能不会照顾他们的癌症患者。只有极少数的肿瘤科医生会尽一切努力来挽救他们。

5)外科手术,放射疗法和化学疗法均可促进癌症向远处器官或组织的转移或扩散。没有手术可以清除所有癌细胞。没有放射线或化学疗法药物可以消除所有癌细胞。

6)传统疗法并非旨在治愈任何癌症。肿瘤科医生不使用“治愈”一词,因为他们认为任何癌症都无法治愈。常用术语是化学缓解,完全缓解,长期生存。没有医生可以保证他们对患者进行的治疗会导致任何期望的预后。

7)癌症中心对开发治疗任何癌症的方法不感兴趣。肿瘤科医生可能会使用对癌症没有任何功效的不合标准的治疗方法。大学进行了大量的基础研究。但是,临床医生和大学教授都没有动机将基本发现转化为任何可以帮助癌症患者的治疗方法。

8)没有治疗方法可以杀死100%的癌细胞。所有治疗均可能导致继发性癌症。

9)一种治疗可能会使癌症患者缓解,但是诸如放射疗法和化学疗法之类的治疗本身可能会产生继发性癌症,迟早会杀死该患者。

10)治疗可以由金钱利益驱动。即使乳房切除术提供相同的结果,外科医生也可以进行根治性乳房切除术,因为根治性乳房切除术为医生赚取了更多的钱。

11)肿瘤学家可能比康复患者更感兴趣于为自己辩护以抗诉讼或使他们的收入最大化。

$$$ 如果你愿意,你可以在这捐款支持我们。谢谢。$$$
$$$ If you would, you can make a donation here to support us. Thank you. $$$

10