COVID-19 vaccines to decimate world population, warns microbiologist … and it’s already happening in India and Brazil 微生物學家警告說,COVID-19疫苗可摧毀世界人口……印度和巴西已經在使用這種疫苗

有健康問題,聯繫陸博士

Thursday, April 29, 2021 by: Divina Ramirez

https://www.afinalwarning.com/514522.html Copy URL

Image: COVID-19 vaccines to decimate world population, warns microbiologist … and it’s already happening in India and Brazil

(Natural News) A world-renowned microbiologist has warned that that the new Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines are contributing to the decimation of the world’s population.

In an exclusive interview with The New American this month, German microbiologist Sucharit Bhakdi explained how coronavirus vaccines affect the body at the cellular level. He warned that these vaccines are set to cause a global catastrophe and decimate the human population.

Vaccines are either useless or dangerous

During the interview, Bhakdi emphasized the dangers associated with the new vaccines. For one, the vaccines cannot actually do what manufacturers say they can. According to Bhakdi, it is practically impossible to prevent infection, even after vaccination.

In fact, it is naïve to think getting vaccinated can prevent infection. That’s because any antibodies the body may produce following vaccination would be too minuscule to do anything significant. (Related: Researchers confirm antibodies from the AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine cause blood clots.)

Bhakdi also stressed the fact that SARS-CoV-2 is not a killer virus, contrary to popular belief. That’s because up to five people only will die of COVID-19 for every 10,000 people infected. For a vaccine to be deemed efficient, it has to guarantee that it will bring that number down further. But that would be incredibly difficult to show.

No clinical trial can be designed to show this, said Bhakdi. To do so, scientists would have to vaccinate millions, if not billions of people. They would then have to count how many died among the vaccinated and the unvaccinated group and compare data from the two. This has never been shown.

Plus, it is near-impossible for people under 70 years and without a preexisting condition to die of COVID-19. If it were a matter of preventing coughs or the cold, then the efficacy of the vaccines wouldn’t be such a controversial topic. But this is a matter of protecting against severe illness and death.

“I don’t want a vaccine that may kill me [but] that may protect me from getting a cold,” said Bhakdi.

He also argued that vaccine manufacturers do not have sufficient data on the efficacy of their vaccines on older people with preexisting conditions. Such testing would likely lead to a string of deaths. Therefore, the claim that the new COVID-19 vaccines are efficacious is a lie, said Bhakdi. “It is so unethical it’s criminal.”

In a nutshell, the new vaccines are useless for younger adults because the antibodies produced are insignificant and useless for older adults due to lack of testing and data.

Furthermore, Bhakdi emphasized that blood clots as a side effect of vaccination should not be taken lightly because they are potentially fatal. If clotting factors are used up because of the vaccine, the patient could suffer internal bleeding. In severe cases, internal bleeding is fatal even with proper treatment.

Plus, vaccinating younger adults may do more harm than good. Younger adults have stronger immune systems. The vaccine “trains” immune cells to attack the virus. This training excites immune cells, causing them to be much more aggressive once the actual virus enters the body. As a result, the person might develop more severe symptoms than if he or she hadn’t been vaccinated.

This is all leading up to the decimation of the entire population, added Bhakdi. In order to protect ourselves and the next generation, we must decline the vaccines, he concluded. More health experts and medical professionals should also call out the inefficacy of the new vaccines and the harm they may bring.

Bhakdi also criticizes PCR testing

Bhakdi, who studied medicine at several German universities, also stated that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test used to detect a COVID-19 infection is “highly fallible.” But despite this, health authorities continue to use it as their main diagnostic criteria for COVID-19. This, Bhakdi said, is where the problem lies.

Speaking to the magazine’s senior editor, Alex Newman, Bhakdi explained that PCR tests can detect active viral particles and dead fragments of the virus. But the test has not been designed to be able to tell active particles from dead fragments.

In other words, a person with COVID-19 and a person who has dead fragments of SARS-CoV-2 will have positive PCR test results. Both will be tagged as COVID-19 patients and subjected to health protocols.

In a nutshell, the PCR test allows health authorities to take every positive result as a confirmed COVID-19 case. To highlight how troubling this is, Bhakdi uses a breathalyzer test as an example.

A person who has been drinking a bottle of vodka would no doubt fail the test and have their license revoked. A person who drank only a glass of vodka hours prior might still pass under normal circumstances. Imagine if police officers revoked a person’s license because they detected insignificant amounts of alcohol in the person’s system, said Bhakdi. That’s how health authorities are using the PCR test.

Bhakdi also explained that the PCR test cannot distinguish between active viral particles and dead fragments of the virus because it was never calibrated to do so. This is because the laboratory that developed the PCR test never had samples of SARS-CoV-2, to begin with.

Therefore, it’s highly likely that a COVID-19 diagnosis based on the results of a PCR test is false. Bhakdi, who is of German and Thai descent but was born in the United States, expressed his disbelief at how American physicians are not calling out this faulty system, adding that they were “losing their medicine.”

Go to Vaccines.news to learn more about the health risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccines.

Sources include:

RumourMillNews.com

Nature.com

一位世界著名的微生物學家警告說,新的武漢冠狀病毒(COVID-19)疫苗正在助長世界人口的滅絕。

在本月的《新美國人》專訪中,德國微生物學家Sucharit Bhakdi解釋了冠狀病毒疫苗如何在細胞水平上影響人體。他警告說,這些疫苗將引起全球災難,並使人口減少。
疫苗無用或危險

在採訪中,巴克迪強調了與新疫苗有關的危險。一方面,疫苗實際上無法做到製造商說的可以做的事情。據巴克迪說,即使在接種疫苗後,實際上也無法預防感染。

實際上,認為接種疫苗可以預防感染是幼稚的。那是因為疫苗接種後人體可能產生的任何抗體都太微小了,無法做任何重要的事情。 (相關:研究人員確認阿斯利康冠狀病毒疫苗的抗體會導致血塊。)

巴克迪還強調說,SARS-CoV-2不是致命病毒,這與普遍的看法相反。這是因為每10,000人被感染時,只有多達五人會死於COVID-19。對於一種被認為有效的疫苗,它必須保證它將使這一數字進一步降低。但這將很難顯示。

Bhakdi說,沒有任何臨床試驗可以證明這一點。為此,科學家必須為數百萬人(甚至數十億人)接種疫苗。然後,他們將不得不計算接種疫苗的人群和未接種疫苗的人群中有多少人死亡,並比較兩者的數據。這從未顯示過。

另外,對於70歲以下且沒有預先存在的條件而死於COVID-19的人來說,這幾乎是不可能的。如果是預防咳嗽或感冒的問題,那麼疫苗的功效將不是一個有爭議的話題。但這是防止嚴重疾病和死亡的問題。

“我不想要一種可能殺死我的疫苗,但是可以保護我免受感冒的傷害,”巴克迪說。

他還認為,疫苗生產商沒有足夠的數據說明疫苗對已有疾病的老年人的功效。這樣的測試可能會導致一連串的死亡。因此,聲稱新的COVID-19疫苗有效的說法是一個謊言,Bhakdi說。 “這太不道德了,是犯罪的。”

簡而言之,由於缺乏測試和數據,新疫苗對年輕人無用,因為產生的抗體微不足道,對成年人也無用。

此外,巴克迪強調,不要輕易掉落作為疫苗接種副作用的血凝塊,因為它們可能致命。如果由於疫苗耗盡了凝血因子,則患者可能會遭受內出血。在嚴重的情況下,即使進行適當的治療,內部出血也是致命的。

另外,給年輕人接種疫苗可能弊大於利。年輕人的免疫系統更強。該疫苗“訓練”免疫細胞攻擊病毒。這種訓練會激發免疫細胞,一旦真正的病毒進入人體,它們就會變得更具攻擊性。結果,與未接種疫苗的人相比,該人可能出現更嚴重的症狀。

Bhakdi補充說,這全都導致了整個人口的減少。他總結說,為了保護自己和下一代,我們必須拒絕使用疫苗。更多的健康專家和醫學專家也應該指出新疫苗的無效性以及它們可能帶來的危害。

巴克迪還批評PCR測試

在德國幾所大學學習醫學的巴克迪還表示,用於檢測COVID-19感染的聚合酶鏈反應(PCR)測試“極易出錯”。但是儘管如此,衛生當局仍繼續將其用作COVID-19的主要診斷標準。巴克迪說,這就是問題所在。

巴克迪在接受雜誌高級編輯亞歷克斯·紐曼(Alex Newman)的採訪時解釋說,PCR測試可以檢測病毒的活性病毒顆粒和死亡片段。但是,該測試尚未設計為能夠分辨死角碎片中的活性顆粒。

換句話說,具有COVID-19的人和具有SARS-CoV-2死亡片段的人將具有陽性PCR測試結果。雙方都將被標記為COVID-19患者並接受健康規程。

簡而言之,PCR測試使衛生部門可以將每個陽性結果作為已確認的COVID-19病例。為了強調這是多麼令人不安,Bhakdi以呼氣測醉試驗為例。

一直喝一瓶伏特加酒的人無疑會通過考試,並被吊銷執照。在正常情況下,一個小時前僅喝一杯伏特加酒的人可能仍然會通過。 Bhakdi說,想像一下警察是否因為在人的系統中檢測到少量酒精而吊銷了人的執照。這就是衛生部門使用PCR測試的方式。

Bhakdi還解釋說,PCR測試無法區分病毒的活性病毒顆粒和死亡片段,因為從未對其進行過校準。這是因為開始進行PCR測試的實驗室從來沒有SARS-CoV-2樣品。

因此,基於PCR測試結果的COVID-19診斷很有可能是錯誤的。巴克迪(Bhakdi)是德國人和泰國人,但出生於美國。他對美國醫生如何稱呼這種有缺陷的系統表示懷疑,並稱他們正在“失去藥物”。

$$$ 如果你愿意,你可以在这捐款支持我们。谢谢。$$$
$$$ If you would, you can make a donation here to support us. Thank you. $$$

3