睡眠时间与心血管疾病风险有关

JKZX.com分享美国彩票部分所有权活动. 不少成功的病例表明,大多癌症通过健康的饮食包括一些保健品是可以长期控制的。有需要者,跟我们联系。

Saturday March 3, 2019 (jkzx.com) — 流行病学和动物研究表明,习惯性睡眠模式与心血管疾病风险之间存在联系。

2017年发表在“生物与医学节律研究杂志”上的一项中国研究发现,睡眠持续时间与心血管疾病风险之间存在关联。

该研究招募了来自中国12个省和115个社区的46,285名35至70岁的参与者。参与者报告了他们的睡眠模式和他们的心血管疾病状况。

该研究发现,与每天睡7或8小时的人相比,每天睡9小时或更长时间的参与者患心血管疾病的可能性要高16%。

那些每天只睡6小时的人患心血管疾病的风险更大。与那些每天睡7或8小时的人相比,这些参与者患心血管疾病的可能性高56%。

那些在白天小睡的人也患心血管疾病的风险很高。

睡眠时间是否会影响心脏病风险?该研究不能给出肯定的答案。那些患有心血管疾病的人往往会有睡眠问题。因此,在许多情况下,每天睡眠时间超过9小时或每天不足6小时或者白天不得不匆匆忙忙的人可能需要检查并查看他们是否患有心血管疾病。(Dr. Lu)

Sleeping hours linked to risk of cardiovascular disease

Epidemiological and animal studies have suggested that there is a link between habitual sleep patterns and risk of cardiovascular disease.

A Chinese study published in 2017 in the Journal of Biological and Medical Rhythm Research found an association between the sleeping duration and risk of cardiovascular disease.

The study enlisted 46,285 participants age 35 to 70 years from 12 provinces and 115 communities in China.  Participants reported their sleeping patterns and their status of cardiovascular disease.

The study found that participants who slept 9 or more hours per day were 16% more likely to suffer cardiovascular disease, compared to those who slept 7 or 8 hours a day.

Those who only slept 6 hours a day were at even greater risk for cardiovascular disease.  Compared to those who slept 7 or 8 hours a day, these participants were 56% more likely to have cardiovascular disease.

Those who took a nap during daytime were also at high risk of cardiovascular disease.

Does sleeping hours have an impact on the heart disease risk?  May or may not.  Those who have cardiovascular disease tend to have sleeping issues.  So in many cases, people who sleep for 9 or more hours a day or less than 6 hours a day or they have to take a snap during the day time may need to check and see if they suffer cardiovascular disease.

$$$ 如果你愿意,你可以在这捐款支持我们。谢谢。$$$
$$$ If you would, you can make a donation here to support us. Thank you. $$$

16

No Responses

Write a response