Gerson therapy vs conventional treatments – impact on 5-year survival for melanoma patients

中文版谷歌中文翻譯(90% 準確率) | English translation
Buy/Sell Your Domains Here。在這裡購買/出售您的域名
Contact Dr. Lu for information about cancer treatments。聯繫盧博士,獲取有關癌症治療資訊。

1995年发布的一份报告比较了采用Gerson疗法治疗的黑色素瘤患者和接受常规治疗的患者的生存率。该报告表明,Gerson疗法比传统疗法更有效。

对于患有1期和II期黑素瘤的患者,Gerson疗法的5年生存率为100%,而常规治疗的患者为79%。

对于患有IIIA期黑色素瘤的患者,接受Gerson治疗的患者有82%的机会存活超过五年,而传统治疗的患者为39%。

对于患有IVA期黑色素瘤的患者,接受Gerson治疗的患者在五年内存活率为39%,而传统治疗组仅有6%。

对于其他黑色素瘤阶段的患者,未报告结果。

该报告表明,与常规治疗相比,Gerson治疗对抗黑素瘤更有效。常规治疗包括手术,化疗和放射治疗。

黑色素瘤是最具攻击性的皮肤癌。

Gerson therapy vs conventional treatments – impact on 5-year survival for melanoma patients

A report released in 1995 compares the survival rate of patients with melanoma treated with Gerson Therapy with that of patients treated with conventional treatments. The report indicates that Gerson therapy is much more effective than the conventional treatments.

For patients with stage 1 and II melanoma, Gerson Therapy leads to a100% 5 year survival rate, compared to 79% of those treated with conventional treatments.

For patients with stage IIIA melanoma, those treated with Gerson therapy had a 82% chances to survive more than five years, as compared to 39% for those treated by conventional treatments.

For patients with stage IVA melanoma, those treated with Gerson therapy had a 39% chances to survive over five years, compared to only 6% for those treated with conventional therapies.

For patients of other stages of melanoma, results were not reported.

This report suggests that Gerson therapy is more effective at fighting melanoma than conventional treatments, which include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy.

Melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer.

$$$ If you are interested in a writer or editor position, check out here.We are hiring. $$$

71

No Responses

Write a response

4 × 2 =