Contact Dr. Lu for information about cancer treatments。聯繫盧博士，獲取有關癌症治療資訊。
Neither survey represents a random sample of all American physicians, but the AAPS survey shows that physician support for the mass injection campaign is far from unanimous.
“It is wrong to call a person who declines a shot an ‘anti-vaxxer,’” states AAPS executive director Jane Orient, M.D. “Virtually no physicians are ‘anti-antibiotics’ or ‘anti-surgery,’ whereas all are opposed to treatments that they think are unnecessary, more likely to harm than to benefit an individual patient, or inadequately tested.”
The AAPS survey also showed that 54 percent of physician respondents were aware of patients suffering a “significant adverse reaction.” Of the unvaccinated physicians, 80 percent said “I believe risk of shots exceeds risk of disease,” and 30% said “I already had COVID.”
Other reasons for declining the shot included unknown long-term effects, use of aborted fetal tissue, “it’s experimental,” availability of effective early treatment, and reports of deaths and blood clots.
Of 560 practicing physicians, 56 percent said they offered early treatment for COVID.
Nonphysicians were also invited to participate in the survey. Of some 5,300 total participants, 2,548 volunteered comments about associated adverse effects of which they were aware. These included death, amputation, paralysis, stillbirth, menstrual irregularities, blindness, seizures, and heart issues.
“Causality is not proven. However, many of these episodes might have resulted in a huge product liability or malpractice award if they had occurred after a new drug,” stated Dr. Orient. “Purveyors of these COVID products are protected against lawsuits.”
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons has represented physicians in all specialties since 1943. Its motto is omnia pro aegroto, everything for the patient.
在回應美國醫師和外科醫生協會 (AAPS) 的一項互聯網調查的 700 名醫生中，近 60% 的人表示他們沒有“完全接種”新冠病毒疫苗。
這與美國醫學會聲稱 96% 的執業醫師已完全接種疫苗的說法形成鮮明對比。這是基於 300 名受訪者。
兩項調查均不代表所有美國醫生的隨機樣本，但 AAPS 調查顯示，醫生對大規模注射運動的支持遠非一致。
“將拒絕注射的人稱為‘反疫苗者’是錯誤的，”AAPS 執行董事 Jane Orient 說他們認為不必要的治療，更有可能對個體患者造成傷害而不是受益，或者測試不充分。”
AAPS 調查還顯示，54% 的醫生受訪者知道患者患有“重大不良反應”。在未接種疫苗的醫生中，80% 的人說“我相信注射的風險超過疾病的風險”，30% 的人說“我已經感染了 COVID”。
在 560 名執業醫師中，56% 的人表示他們為 COVID 提供早期治療。
非醫師也被邀請參與調查。在大約 5,300 名參與者中，有 2,548 名自願評論他們知道的相關不良反應。這些包括死亡、截肢、癱瘓、死產、月經不調、失明、癲癇和心臟問題。
“因果關係尚未得到證實。但是，如果這些事件發生在新藥之後，其中許多事件可能會導致巨額的產品責任或醫療事故賠償，”Orient 博士說。 “這些 COVID 產品的供應商受到保護，免受訴訟。”
自 1943 年以來，美國內科醫生和外科醫生協會一直代表所有專業的醫生。其座右銘是omnia pro aegroto，一切為了患者。